Skip to content
Get alerts

Like-for-like, across clouds

Compare

The same thing, priced by each vendor, on one unit that means the same to all of them. Every figure names the SKUs it was built from and links to them, so you can check the arithmetic rather than take it on trust.
Why these prices can be compared at all
Vendors do not sell the same shape. Google prices a machine's cores and its memory separately; AWS prices the whole instance. So a like-for-like figure is composed — four cores plus sixteen gigabytes on one side, the instance type whose spec is four cores and sixteen gigabytes on the other. Where both vendors publish the same unit already, such as a gigabyte-month of object storage, the comparison is direct. Every result is scoped to one region group and one pricing model, so a committed rate is never held up against an on-demand one.

Not enough to compare here

Only Google Cloud publishes something that qualifies for this combination at 4 vCPU · 16 GB in MEA on committed pricing. A one-sided chart is not a comparison, so there isn't one.

How each number was built

The cheapest qualifying configuration per cloud, and the SKUs it is made of

No qualifying configuration from AWS under these pivots. Absent, not zero.

Where it is cheapest

Same configuration on committed pricing, by geography

Cheapest price per vendor for each region, in per hour.
RegionGoogle Cloud
United States & Canada$0.0680
Europe$0.0748
Asia Pacific$0.0787
Middle East & Africa$0.0748

What a commitment is worth

Same configuration in MEA, by pricing model

Cheapest price per vendor for each pricing model, in per hour.
Pricing modelGoogle Cloud
On-demand$0.1513
Committed$0.074851%

One- and three-year commitments, reserved instances and savings plans, pooled. Terms differ; read the detail rows.